Skip to main content

Peters & Peters

ESG Enforcement Tracker

Charting the rise of criminal and regulatory enforcement

German court dismisses “climate-neutral” adverts claim

Date:
15 December 2021
Relevant legislation/regulation:
Act against Unfair Competition
Jurisdiction:
Germany
Status:
Ongoing
Regulator/enforcement authority:
Civil case
ESG Category:
Environmental
Defendant(s)/subjects(s):
Anonymous party (confectionary manufacturer)

Key Facts:

In June 2022, the Kleve Regional Court dismissed a claim for misleading commercial practices against a confectionery manufacturer regarding an advertisement claiming that the company had been producing all of its products “in a climate neutral way”. Similar claims were also brought against a jam manufacturer.

The claimant argued that the advert was misleading as consumers would understand it to be claiming that the manufacturing process itself was climate neutral. The defendant company did not dispute that its manufacturing process was not carbon neutral. Instead, it argued that, as confectionery production cannot be CO2 emission free, the CO2 produced was offset through support of climate protection projects.

The Kleve Regional Court dismissed the claim, emphasising that the target audience was a professional audience as the advert appeared in a trade publication. The court held that “climate neutral” is not synonymous with “emission-free” and that climate neutrality can be achieved through compensation (i.e. through support of climate protection projects). The court considered that it was sufficient that the defendant included a URL in the advert with information about how it offset its emissions.

This decision was appealed. In July 2023, the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court dismissed the appeal but allowed a revision in order to provide guidance for adverts using the term “climate neutral”, since this topic had not previously been clarified by senior courts. The court explained that the average consumer would be aware that the term “climate neutral” can refer either to an avoidance of emissions or, alternatively, a balance of emissions by way of compensation. This is because the average consumer knows that products and services which cannot be produced or provided without emissions are also advertised as “climate-neutral”.

The Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court has since allowed an appeal to the German Federal Court of Justice in light of the fundamental importance of the subject matter.

Sources: 

Kleve Regional Court judgment

Related Insights

FCA’s proposed regulation of ESG ratings

The CMA’s latest guidance: making green claims across the supply chain

AI, advertising, and green claims: how the ASA is stepping up its game

ESG Enforcement Tracker featured in The Lawyer’s Spotlight

The hidden price tag: human rights and money laundering risks in supply chains

International Court of Justice confirms that States have a legal duty to protect and prevent harm to the climate