Peters & Peters

ESG Enforcement Tracker

Charting the rise of criminal and regulatory enforcement

SEC charges Compass Minerals for misleading investors

Date:
23 September 2022
Relevant legislation/regulation:
Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Jurisdiction:
United States
Status:
Closed
Regulator/enforcement authority:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
ESG Category:
Environmental
Defendant(s)/subjects(s):
Compass Minerals International Inc. (Compass)

Key Facts:

Compass accepted a civil penalty of US$12 million to settle charges brought against it by the SEC that it had misled investors about a technology upgrade that the company claimed would reduce costs at its most significant mine, but which had in fact increased costs, and that it had failed properly to assess whether to disclose the financial risks created by the company’s excessive discharge of mercury in Brazil.

The charges against Compass are detailed in the SEC’s order dated September 2022. The SEC’s order finds that Compass violated the antifraud, reporting, and internal controls provisions of the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange Act and various related rules.

According to the SEC’s order, Compass repeatedly assured investors in 2017 that a technology upgrade at its Goderich mine – the world’s largest underground salt mine – was on track to materially reduce costs and boost its operating results starting in 2018. Compass’s statements were misleading because they failed to tell investors that costs at the mine were increasing rather than decreasing, which substantially undermined the projected savings. The SEC also found that Compass misled investors by overstating the amount of salt it was able to produce at Goderich.

Separately, the order finds that Compass’s deficient disclosure controls resulted in the company failing properly to assess the financial risks of mercury contamination by one of its former facilities near the Botafogo River, in Pernambuco, Brazil, and that facility’s cover-up of the misconduct by submitting inaccurate test reports to Brazilian environmental authorities. Compass was required to assess whether it must disclose the financial uncertainties of that misconduct to investors but failed to do so.

Compass, without admitting to the findings, accepted a civil penalty of US$12 million and agreed to cease and desist from further violations. Compass also agreed to retain an independent compliance consultant to review and make recommendations concerning its disclosure controls and procedures.

Sources: 

SEC press release and order

Related Insights

The CMA’s latest guidance: making green claims across the supply chain

AI, advertising, and green claims: how the ASA is stepping up its game

ESG Enforcement Tracker featured in The Lawyer’s Spotlight

The hidden price tag: human rights and money laundering risks in supply chains

International Court of Justice confirms that States have a legal duty to protect and prevent harm to the climate

French lawmakers focus on ultra-fast fashion