Skip to main content

Peters & Peters

ESG Enforcement Tracker

Charting the rise of criminal and regulatory enforcement

NGOs bring civil claim against Perenco in connection with alleged environmental damage caused in the DRC

Date:
24 March 2022
Relevant legislation/regulation:
Article 145 of the French Code of Civil Procedure
Jurisdiction:
France
Status:
Updated, Ongoing
Regulator/enforcement authority:
Civil case – NGO
ESG Category:
Environmental
Defendant(s)/subjects(s):
Perenco S.A.

Key Facts:

Perenco S.A. is a French multinational oil and gas company operating internationally, including in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), where it extracts significant volumes of crude oil.

In November 2022, following investigative reporting by Disclose, Investigate Europe and the Environmental Investigative Forum, French NGOs Sherpa and Friends of the Earth France brought a civil claim before the Paris judicial court seeking remediation of alleged environmental damage in the DRC. The claim focuses on extensive pollution linked to Perenco’s operations, including numerous incidents over a 15-year period affecting local ecosystems and human health.

After approximately four years of procedure, the Paris judicial court has confirmed that Perenco will be tried in France for “préjudice écologique” (environmental damage), with the trial expected in late 2026 or early 2027. The company faces potential civil liability, including fines and orders to repair environmental damage.

Recent evidence has reinforced the claimants’ allegations. A June 2025 report by a Congolese parliamentary commission, following an inspection of Perenco’s facilities, found that water was unsafe for consumption, soil degradation had rendered land infertile, and pollution had caused a progressive loss of biodiversity. The report also recorded health issues among local populations (including skin and eye irritation and reports of severe illness) and alleged that Perenco attempted to clean the site prior to inspection to conceal the impact of an accident.

Perenco denies the allegations and argues that it cannot be held liable in France for conduct attributed to its local subsidiary, Perenco REP. The NGOs contend that this reflects a broader strategy by the group to avoid accountability for environmental harm caused abroad. In parallel, a separate preliminary investigation by the French financial prosecutor concerns the allocation of interests in a Congolese oil concession.

The case therefore continues, now entering the trial phase, with potentially significant implications for corporate liability in respect of overseas environmental harm.

Sources: 

Friends of the Earth press release, Sherpa press release (18 September 2020, 10 March 2022 and 9 November 2022), Disclose article and French Supreme Court decision

Related Insights

FCA’s proposed regulation of ESG ratings

The CMA’s latest guidance: making green claims across the supply chain

AI, advertising, and green claims: how the ASA is stepping up its game

ESG Enforcement Tracker featured in The Lawyer’s Spotlight

The hidden price tag: human rights and money laundering risks in supply chains

International Court of Justice confirms that States have a legal duty to protect and prevent harm to the climate