Skip to main content

Peters & Peters

ESG Enforcement Tracker

Charting the rise of criminal and regulatory enforcement

Lafarge charged with complicity in crimes against humanity

Date:
15 November 2016
Jurisdiction:
France
Status:
Ongoing
Regulator/enforcement authority:
French criminal court
ESG Category:
Social
Defendant(s)/subjects(s):
Lafarge SA (Lafarge)

Key Facts:

On 15 November 2016, Sherpa, the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR) and 11 former Syrian employees of Lafarge filed a complaint in France against Lafarge, its Syrian subsidiary and several executives. The complaint against Lafarge was based on claims of financing a terrorist enterprise, aiding and abetting war crimes and crimes against humanity, abusive labour exploitation and endangering the lives of others.

On 9 June 2017, the Public Prosecutor’s Office asked the investigating judge to investigate the charges of financing a terrorist enterprise, subjecting individuals to working conditions incompatible with human dignity and endangering lives.

Lafarge was charged on 28 June 2018 on counts including aiding and abetting crimes against humanity, financing a terrorist enterprise, and endangering the lives of others. On 27 December 2018, the company applied to the Investigating Chamber for its indictment to be quashed, which was rejected by judgment of 24 October 2019.

In a judgment in September 2021, the Cour de Cassation, France’s Supreme Court, quashed and set aside this decision and referred the case back to the Investigating Division of the Paris Court of Appeal.

On 16 January 2024, the French Supreme Court confirmed the charge of complicity in crimes against humanity, but dropped the charge of endangering lives. The court agreed with Lafarge’s contention that there had been no special obligation to protect the workers as French employment law was not applicable, and a particular duty of care or safety did not exist. Under [Regulation (CE) n° 593/2008 of the European Parliament and Council Conseil of 17 June 2008], in the absence of a choice by the parties, an individual employment contract is governed by the law of the country in which or from which the employee usually performs his contract. Only if it was clear from all the circumstances that the contract was more closely connected with France than Syria would French law have governed the employment contract. The investigation for complicity in crimes against humanity remains ongoing.

On 16 November 2024, French investigating judges ordered Lafarge SA and four executives to stand trial before the French criminal court for financing a terrorist organisation and violating EU Sanctions on Syria. Four other individuals will also stand trial.

On 13 April 2026, the Paris Criminal Court found Lafarge and four former executives guilty of financing terrorist groups, including ISIS and groups linked to Al-Qaeda, and breaching EU sanctions on Syria. Lafarge was issued with the maximum penalty under French criminal law: EUR1.125 million and an additional customs penalty of EUR4.57 million in respect of the sanctions breaches. The four executives received prison sentences ranging from three to six years. Four linked individuals including security managers and intermediaries were also convicted. More than 190 former Syrian employees of Lafarge were not awarded compensation, as the court found that individuals cannot qualify as victims of terrorist financing.

The separate investigation for complicity in crimes against humanity is still ongoing before the investigating judges (instruction)

Sources: 

Sherpa press releases (18 May 2022 , 16 Oct 2024 and 13 April 2026) and Court judgment

Related Insights

FCA’s proposed regulation of ESG ratings

The CMA’s latest guidance: making green claims across the supply chain

AI, advertising, and green claims: how the ASA is stepping up its game

ESG Enforcement Tracker featured in The Lawyer’s Spotlight

The hidden price tag: human rights and money laundering risks in supply chains

International Court of Justice confirms that States have a legal duty to protect and prevent harm to the climate