Peters & Peters

ESG Enforcement Tracker

Charting the rise of criminal and regulatory enforcement

Fiducian subsidiary to pay AUD7.3 million penalty for misleading ESG disclosures

Date:
4 March 2026
Relevant legislation/regulation:
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth); Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth)
Jurisdiction:
Australia
Status:
Ongoing
Regulator/enforcement authority:
Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)
ESG Category:
Environmental, Social, Governance
Defendant(s)/subjects(s):
Fiducian Investment Management Services Limited (FIMS), a wholly‑owned subsidiary of Fiducian Group Limited

Key Facts:

ASIC had commenced civil penalty proceedings against Fiducian Investment Management Services Limited in connection with its representations about the Diversified Social Aspirations Fund, which was marketed as a socially responsible investment option between 2015 and 2024. ASIC alleged that Product Disclosure Statements issued for the fund contained ESG and systems statements that were liable to mislead investors about the nature and characteristics of the fund, in contravention of the ASIC Act.

The regulator further alleged that Fiducian failed to act with the care and diligence required of a responsible entity under the Corporations Act. ASIC asserted that Fiducian did not adequately review underlying investments for consistency with stated ESG exclusions, failed to implement sufficient compliance and risk management controls to address ESG‑related risks, and lacked the necessary information to substantiate claims of active ESG monitoring and oversight.

Following court‑ordered mediation, Fiducian Group announced on 30 March 2026 that its subsidiary had entered into a heads of agreement with ASIC to resolve the proceedings. Under the agreement, Fiducian Investment Management Services Limited agreed to pay a financial penalty of AUD7.3 million to the Commonwealth and to pay ASIC’s investigation and legal costs, capped at AUD650,000.

The parties also consented to the making of court declarations acknowledging that the ESG and systems statements in the fund’s disclosures were liable to mislead the public and that Fiducian contravened its responsible entity obligations by failing to exercise appropriate care and diligence. The parties will now agree a statement of agreed facts and admissions, and a date for the conclusion of the proceedings will be set by the NSW Supreme Court.

Sources: 

Financial Newswire article, Money Management article

Related Insights

The CMA’s latest guidance: making green claims across the supply chain

AI, advertising, and green claims: how the ASA is stepping up its game

ESG Enforcement Tracker featured in The Lawyer’s Spotlight

The hidden price tag: human rights and money laundering risks in supply chains

International Court of Justice confirms that States have a legal duty to protect and prevent harm to the climate

French lawmakers focus on ultra-fast fashion