Skip to main content

Peters & Peters

ESG Enforcement Tracker

Charting the rise of criminal and regulatory enforcement

Diplomat found liable for poor working conditions

Date:
17 August 2024
Relevant legislation/regulation:
Fair Work Act 2009
Jurisdiction:
Australia
Status:
Closed
Regulator/enforcement authority:
Australian Federal Court
ESG Category:
Social
Defendant(s)/subjects(s):
Himalee Subashini Arunatilaka

Key Facts:

In August 2024, Sri Lanka’s Ambassador to the UN, Himalee Subashini Arunatilaka, was ordered to pay AU$374,151.90 in unpaid wages to a former domestic worker. Ms Horathal Pedi Gedara Priyanka Danaratna was employed by Ms Arunatilaka as a domestic worker at her home in Canberra from March 2016 to August 2018, while the latter was deputy high commissioner in Australia.

Ms Danaratna had never previously left Sri Lanka, before receiving Ms Arunatilaka’s assistance in obtaining a passport and being granted a subclass 403 domestic worker visa to perform work as Ms Arunatilaka’s private domestic employee. Ms Danaratna was unable to speak or read in English. On arrival in Australia, Ms Danaratna’s passport was taken from her under promise that it would be returned before she left Australia.

In evidence to the court, Ms Danaratna described her standard working hours as 6am to 10pm seven days a week. The evidence revealed that despite what was agreed, Ms Danaratna did not receive her contractual pay, worked seven days a week, and also did not receive any other rights to which she was entitled under the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

The Federal Court of Australia found that Ms Arunatilaka had underpaid Ms Danaratna over three years, effectively paying her only 65 cents per hour.

It also expressed concerns that it should have been clear to the Department of Immigration and Border Protection (as it then was), by reason of the materials provided to it in support of the Subclass 403 domestic worker visa supplication, that Ms Danaratna was not going to be adequately paid nor enjoy the protections afforded under the Act.

The court felt that if the Department had properly scrutinised the visa application, then Ms Danaratna’s employment may have been very different.

Sources: 

 Australian Federal Court judgment

Related Insights

FCA’s proposed regulation of ESG ratings

The CMA’s latest guidance: making green claims across the supply chain

AI, advertising, and green claims: how the ASA is stepping up its game

ESG Enforcement Tracker featured in The Lawyer’s Spotlight

The hidden price tag: human rights and money laundering risks in supply chains

International Court of Justice confirms that States have a legal duty to protect and prevent harm to the climate