Hannah Laming named as one of the world’s leading female investigative lawyers in Global Investigations Review
Global Investigations Review – March 2015
GIR is pleased to present its Women in Investigations special, highlighting remarkable women in the profession. The lawyers and other specialists we’ve chosen come from a variety of countries and backgrounds, and are represented at every age and level, from associates to partners. What is true of all of them, however, is that they are achieving great things in a competitive and notoriously tough area of law.
Following an open nomination process, the final 100 women were selected by GIR’s editorial team and asked to tell us a little about themselves.
I started working on civil fraud cases while at the Bar and enjoyed the work so much that I went to the Serious Fraud Office to work on some of the biggest and most complex fraud investigations. The more involved I got, the more I got the bug! I have specialised in this area for nearly 10 years and each investigation I work on throws up new issues and challenges. It is fast-paced and exciting work.
My mum has been a real inspiration. She was a business woman who saw the opportunities in IT in the 1980s and set up her own business as a consultant on large projects. She managed to negotiate a technical and male-dominated world successfully and had a very matter-of-fact approach. She taught me that you can achieve your goals by having firm resolve and dealing with obstacles in a calm and professional manner.
As a mother of three children, I have actively chosen a work environment that enables me to have a good work/life balance. I think that the most exciting development recently in this area is the introduction of laws making it easier for dads to take extended paternity leave, which will help to remove the assumption that it is women who will take time off to raise children. My husband and I took advantage of earlier changes in the law so that we each took six months of maternity/paternity with our third child. As more men experience the types of issues women face, even simple things like the anxiety you may face when telling your employer that you’re taking maternity/paternity leave, and when employers are equally receptive to men taking such leave, gender equality in the workplace will improve.
The environment for women has changed dramatically since I started work. I remember being criticised for wearing a trouser suit when I first started pupillage! Years ago, there was a perception that women had to choose between family or a career but I don’t think that is true anymore. The challenge now is to introduce changes in the workplace that make it easier for men and women to enjoy a successful career and be productive employees as well as caring for their children. My advice to men and women at the start of their careers would be to choose a job that you are passionate about and always pursue your goals.
An introduction to Women in Investigations 2015
Every March, the world observes International Women’s Day to highlight women’s equality and empowerment. Here at Global Investigations Review, we thought it presented the perfect occasion to put the spotlight on women in the field of investigations.
When thinking about high-powered women in investigations, several names immediately spring to mind. In the United State, Leslie Caldwell leads the Department of Justice’s criminal division, while Mary Jo White is the chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission. President Obama recently nominated Loretta Lynch to become the next US attorney general.
In other countries, too, we find women occupying senior positions in public service. In France, Éliane Houlette was recently appointed the country’s new special financial prosecutor, nicknamed the “super-prosecutor”. In the United Kingdom, the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) former head of enforcement and financial crime, Tracey McDermott, is now the director of supervision and authorisations, and also sits on the organisation’s board.
Of course, there are far more examples out there of hard-working women in the field of investigations, which is why GIR is pleased to acknowledge them in our first ‘Women in Investigations’ special. Here GIR profiles lawyers, government prosecutors, barristers, forensic accountants and various in-house counsel, all of whom can serve as inspirations to current and future generations of investigations professionals.
We’ve searched near and far, from São Paulo to Shanghai, Oslo to Johannesburg, Washington, DC to Sydney, to find the 100 individuals that have come to be included in this list, drawn up to demonstrate the wide variety of talented women that form part of the worldwide investigations community.
In this special, readers can get to know the FCA’s current acting head of enforcement and market oversight, Georgiana Philippou; Marianne Djupesland, head of the anticorruption team at Økokrim, Norway’s national authority for investigation and prosecution of economic and environmental crime, and Daniëlle Goudriaan, the new national coordinating prosecutor for corruption in the Netherlands. We speak to established private practitioners, including former prosecutor Nancy Kestenbaum at Covington & Burling, and Mini Vandepol, who heads Baker & McKenzie’s global compliance group. Among the emerging women in investigations GIR chose to profile we find Leila Babaeva at Miller & Chevalier, Erica Sellin Sarubbi of Brazil’s Trench Rossi e Watanabe Advogados, and Tiana Zhang of Kirkland & Ellis. We also highlight in-house lawyers from global financial institutions such as Barclays and Nomura, and get the forensic accountant perspective from individuals at EY and PwC.
GIR set out to discover what it is that makes these individuals tick, what achievements they are most proud of, and what keeps them busy in their respective jurisdictions. They tell us how they got into this area of law: for many, a combination of their curious nature and a particular knack for solving complex puzzles put them on the investigations track. Others told us of how proud they have been to have represented their countries in public service, and of the personal fulfilment it brought to be part of investigations into misconduct that was at the heart of the 2008 financial crisis.
But we also discussed what affects individuals’ practices the most: the continuing development of the international investigations landscape. They tell us why evidence gathering by foreign lawyers in Switzerland can be problematic; we find out that practitioners in New York and Australia face similar burdens in dealing with a hotchpotch of domestic regulators all looking into similar conduct; and how Brazilian lawyers, in the midst of a snowballing corruption investigation, face “a bumpy road ahead” in attempting to change locals’ mindsets for the better.
Meanwhile, in the United Kingdom, lawyers speak of their concerns regarding future enforcement by the Serious Fraud Office following its tough talk on cooperation in deferred prosecution agreements and legal privilege in investigations.
We also looked into the question of gender and what it means to be a woman in the investigations field. Lawyers speak of the importance of getting enough support from partners at work and partners at home, to successfully balance the often hectic lifestyle as an investigations professional with a fulfilling family life. We hear encouraging examples of offices where there are many women in leadership positions, and of the many female and male role models that have helped shape these professionals’ careers.
Individuals GIR spoke to mentioned that while progress is being made, unconscious bias persists in seemingly innocent decisions: in partnerships dominated by men, who unconsciously champion and promote individuals in their image, or when working parents’ professional progress stalls, simply because fewer working hours are spent in the office in full view of senior management. Some mentioned statistics that show women tend to leave Big Law after having their second child, and talked of potential flexible policies that might help prevent the outflow of such talented professionals in the future. We discuss how the issue should be tackled: for example, among the 100 individuals, we find those people in favour, and others against quotas in the workplace, and we hear about individual experiences with such policies so far. We’re told employers need to be “creative” about gender equality, and that the abolition of double standards – for example allowing both male and female parents leave to spend time with their families – will go a long way towards creating a more equal workplace. However, if there’s one common thread, it is that on top of gender equality, overall diversity should be embraced and promoted further.
Lastly, we also set out to discover more about the women outside of their profession, and can happily report that among our 100, we have a former prosecutor with a penchant for figure skating, one whose children call her “The Enforcer”, an individual who is fascinated by lighthouses, and a lawyer who can perform the folk dances of over a dozen countries.