"Peters & Peters also shows the continuing hold that litigation boutiques - as opposed to enormous international firms - have on contentious work" - The Lawyer, 2013

Articles

An article considering the implications of civil Closed Material Proceedings, (p 1736)
LAST YEAR we were told of HM Revenue & Customs' intention to clampdown on "morally indefensible tax evasion". ... To read the full article please click on the link below.
Case Notes provided by Jessica Moore for X,Y,Z and Brian Morgan v A Local Authority (2011) EWHC 1157 (FAM)
To read this edition of The Antitrust Bulletin please click on the attachment below.
To read Monty's article please click on the link below.
To read Keith's chapter please click on the attachment below.
The latest Supreme Court ruling on the application of the civil burden of proof in criminal proceedings reflects the political confusion behind proceeds of crime laws, say David McCluskey and Miranda Ching,
To read Professor Mitsilegas's article which examines the European Commisison's report on creating a European Union criminal policy and whether the approach to criminal policy is likely to lead to an increase in EU criminal law, please click on the attachment below. As well as an academic advisor to Peters & Peters, Professor Mitsilegas is Professor of European Criminal Law, and Director of the Criminal Justice Centre, Queen Mary, University of London.
To read this article from The Lawyer please click on the external link below.
To read the article please click on the link below.

Pages